<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Obit Research &#187; studies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://obitresearch.com/tag/studies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://obitresearch.com</link>
	<description>Exploring the American obituary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 04:08:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;The Reporting of Grief&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://obitresearch.com/2009/10/26/the-reporting-of-grief/</link>
		<comments>http://obitresearch.com/2009/10/26/the-reporting-of-grief/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 02:46:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kate Goshorn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[studies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://obitresearch.com/?p=157</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As part of my obituary research I read an interesting study, &#8220;The Reporting of Grief&#8221;, by one newspaper of record for the U.S.: the New York Times. The study seems to be more about articles about the grief process and grieving in general, rather than obituary writing, but I thought what the study said was [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As part of my obituary research I read an interesting study, &#8220;The Reporting of Grief&#8221;, by one newspaper of record for the U.S.: the New York Times.</p>
<p>The study seems to be more about articles about the grief process and grieving in general, rather than obituary writing, but I thought what the study said was interesting and telling.  Here are some highlights:</p>
<ul>
<li>The study asks: Is grief socially constructed by the media?</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>People, the study says,  look to institutions to help them understand grief and give them instructions on how to grieve.  The definitions provided by institutions are never all-inclusive, and leads to &#8220;disenfranchised grief.&#8221;</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>The study says the media (and I would argue the larger American popular culture) present grief as an abnormal state of mind, something to be &#8220;cured&#8221; of.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li> The study found that experts gave different, conflicting messages about grieving depending on the framing of reporters&#8217; questions.</li>
</ul>
<p>Also interesting is that during 2000-2006 articles equated handling one&#8217;s grief &#8220;well&#8221; with handling it quickly.  The study ends by recommending that topics not be chosen/constructed with the aim of &#8220;curing&#8221; or &#8220;taming&#8221; an illness, because grief isn&#8217;t an illness, but a personal journey.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://obitresearch.com/2009/10/26/the-reporting-of-grief/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

